ArticleBMC research notes2025
Barriers to home-based physical activity and predictors of activity levels among women with high sedentary habits: an explanatory mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise Perceptions, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy Among Adults in Kuwait During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in the Impact of Physical Activity Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Psychosocial transformation in women new to fitness: a phenomenological study on body image, self-confidence, and identity construction.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Physical activity barriers, nutrition, motivation, and body composition in university students.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUnderstanding barriers to home-based physical activity is crucial for developing strategies to increase participation among women with high sedentary habits. This study aims to comprehensively scrutinize these barriers and predictor factors of physical activity levels, utilizing an explanatory mixed methods design. The quantitative phase involved 537 women, who completed a researcher-made questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) to assess physical activity levels, predictor factors, and barriers. The qualitative phase engaged 12 participants through in-depth interviews to gain a deeper understanding of barriers. Chi-square statistical tests, multinomial logistic regression, and content analysis were used.
results83.8% of women were in the inactive and low-activity category. The main barriers to physical activity included not prioritizing exercise, insufficient time, household responsibilities, and a deficit in motivation. Predictors included environmental barriers (P = 0.009, β = 0.701), social obstacles (P ≤ 0.001, β = 1.179), and lack of motivation (P ≤ 0.001, β = 1.836), all of which significantly impact the level of moderate to vigorous physical activity. The qualitative analysis classified barriers into three categories: personal, social, and environmental. Interventions such as community programs, awareness campaigns, and improved infrastructure are crucial. Health policymakers can take action with targeted strategies to remove barriers and promote women's physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.