Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375348›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

Distinct pathway-based effects of blood pressure and body mass index on cardiovascular traits: comparison of novel Mendelian randomization approaches.

Genevieve M Leyden, Maria K Sobczyk, Tom G Richardson, Tom R Gaunt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Genevieve M Leyden *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. genevieve.leyden@bristol.ac.uk.
Maria K Sobczyk *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Tom G RichardsonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Tom R GauntMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. tom.gaunt@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0924-3247

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_0032/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMendelian randomization (MR) leverages trait associated genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to determine causal relationships in epidemiology. However, genetic IVs for complex traits are typically highly heterogeneous and, at a molecular level, exert effects on different biological processes. Exploration of the biological underpinnings of such heterogeneity can enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms and inform therapeutic strategies. Here, we introduce a new approach to instrument partitioning based on enrichment of Mendelian disease categories (pathway-partitioned) and compare it to an existing method based on genetic colocalization in contrasting tissues (tissue-partitioned).

methodsWe employed individual- and summary-level MR methodologies using SNPs grouped by pathway informed by proximity to Mendelian disease genes affecting the renal system or vasculature (for blood pressure (BP)), or mental health and metabolic disorders (for body mass index (BMI)). We compared the causal effects of pathway-partitioned SNPs on cardiometabolic outcomes with those derived using tissue-partitioned SNPs informed by colocalization with gene expression in kidney, artery (BP), or adipose and brain tissues (BMI). Additionally, we assessed the likelihood that estimates observed for partitioned exposures could emerge by chance using random SNP sampling.

resultsOur pathway-partitioned findings suggest the causal relationship between systolic BP and heart disease is predominantly driven by vessel over renal pathways. The stronger effect attributed to kidney over artery tissue in our tissue-partitioned MR hints at a multifaceted interplay between pathways in the disease aetiology. We consistently identified a dominant role for vessel (pathway) and artery (tissue) driving the negative directional effect of diastolic BP on left ventricular stroke volume and positive directional effect of systolic BP on type 2 diabetes. We also found when dissecting the BMI pathway contribution to atrial fibrillation that metabolic-pathway and brain-tissue IVs predominantly drove the causal effects relative to mental health and adipose in pathway- and tissue-partitioned MR analyses, respectively.

conclusionsThis study presents a novel approach to dissecting heterogeneity in MR by integrating clinical phenotypes associated with Mendelian disease. Our findings emphasize the importance of understanding pathway-/tissue-specific contributions to complex exposures when interpreting causal relationships in MR. Importantly, we advocate caution and robust validation when interpreting pathway-partitioned effect size differences.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesMendelian Randomization AnalysisGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideBlood pressureBody mass indexCardiovascular diseaseColocalizationGenetic epidemiologyMendelian diseaseMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID40375348
PMCPMC12079859

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.