ReviewAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2025
Perspectives on the Current and Future State of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Genetics.
Review in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics: Current practice and attitudes among the clinical genetics workforce.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Genetics: Current Applications and Challenges.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Disparate language and model effects on AI-based translation and recognition of genetic conditions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Wavelet-Based Pattern ERG Biomarkers Outperform Temporal Amplitude Measures for Functional Stratification in Optic Nerve Disease.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional Quantification of Macular Cone Activity in Pattern Electroretinography Using Discrete Wavelet Transform.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosing rare bone diseases: a global survey of healthcare professionals.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming numerous aspects of daily life, including clinical practice and biomedical research. In light of this rapid transformation, and in the context of medical genetics, we assembled a group of leaders in the field to respond to the question about how AI is affecting, and especially how AI will affect, medical genetics. The authors who contributed to this collection of essays intentionally represent different areas of expertise, career stages, and geographies, and include diverse types of clinicians, computer scientists, and researchers. The individual pieces cover a wide range of areas related to medical genetics; we expect that these pieces may provide helpful windows into the ways in which AI is being actively studied, used, and considered in medical genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.