Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375585›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

Structural weight stigma in healthcare toward preconception, pregnant, and postpartum women: A systematic review.

Chloe Tran, Stephanie Pirotta, Haimanot Hailu, Pragya Kandel, Helen Skouteris, Briony Hill

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Structural weight stigma in healthcare toward preconception, pregnant, and postpartum women: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chloe TranHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-5886-1696
Stephanie PirottaHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Haimanot HailuHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9608-0364
Pragya KandelHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Helen SkouterisHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9959-5750
Briony HillHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4993-3963

Funding

Australian Research Training Program (RTP)Australia Research Council Discovery Project DP220101107Australia Research Council Early Career Research Award DE230100704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStructural weight stigma for reproductive-aged women can limit healthcare access and increase physical and mental health concerns, with adverse intergenerational outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of structural weight stigma in healthcare and determine how that impacts the care for women across the preconception, pregnant, and postpartum periods. METHODOLOGY: The concepts of stigma, weight, healthcare, and women of reproductive age were combined and searched in five databases (Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL) and 12 gray literature sources. Inclusion criteria consisted of any peer-reviewed study or government policy that described a structural element within healthcare (e.g., guidelines, funding, insurance, equipment, physical environment) relevant to women of reproductive age (18-50 years) between 2001 and 2023. A narrative synthesis using a convergent approach was employed to analyze results.

resultsA total of 70 studies were included in this review; 24 qualitative, 21 quantitative, 10 policies, 3 dissertations, and one mixed-method study. Structural weight stigma in healthcare presented across: 1) institutional policies that are weight-centric and often placed women in larger bodies on "high-risk" pathways; 2) the lack of government funding and insurance coverage for weight-related services; 3) uncertainty amongst healthcare professions regarding their roles and responsibilities, 4) stigmatizing physical environments; and 5) lack of appropriately sized equipment.

conclusionsStructural weight stigma impacting preconception, pregnant and postpartum women living in larger bodies was highly prevalent. Reducing structural weight stigma is important to improve healthcare access and improve the quality of care.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodPreconception CareSocial StigmaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyhealthcarestructural weight stigmaweight stigmawomen of reproductive age

Identifiers

PMID40375585
PMCPMC12318919

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.