Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375766›Full record

Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high ischaemic risk: a post hoc analysis of the TWILIGHT trial.

Mauro Gitto, Usman Baber, Samantha Sartori, Birgit Vogel, Dominick J Angiolillo, Carlo Briguori, David J Cohen, Timothy Collier, Dariusz Dudek, Angelo Oliva and 18 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ticagrelor-based antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic coronary syndrome.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Mauro GittoMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Usman BaberDepartment of Cardiology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Samantha SartoriMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Birgit VogelMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Dominick J AngiolilloDivision of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Carlo BriguoriUnit of Interventional Cardiology, Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy.
David J CohenCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Timothy CollierDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Dariusz DudekJagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Angelo OlivaMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Javier EscanedHospital Clínico San Carlos IdISCC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Yihan FengMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
C Michael GibsonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ya-Ling HanGeneral Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Francesca Maria Di MuroMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Richard A ShlofmitzSt. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.
Kurt HuberThird Department Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Philippe Gabriel StegUniversité Paris-Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, INSERM_U1148, Paris, France.
Samin SharmaMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Gennaro SardellaPoliclinico Umberto I University, Rome, Italy.
Adnan KastratiDeutsches Herzzentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Upendra KaulBatra Hospital and Medical Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Ran KornowskiRabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Vijay KunadianTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Giulio G StefaniniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Shamir R MehtaHamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
George DangasMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Roxana MehranMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShort dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by ticagrelor monotherapy may be a valuable therapeutic option for patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and high ischaemic risk (HIR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

aimsWe aimed to compare ticagrelor monotherapy with ticagrelor-based DAPT in CCS patients with and without HIR undergoing PCI.

methodsThe present analysis included the CCS cohort of the TWILIGHT trial, which randomised PCI patients to ticagrelor alone or in combination with aspirin for 12 months after 3 months of ticagrelor-based DAPT. Patients were stratified into HIR and non-HIR based on the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines definition. Outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction or stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 2-5 bleeding at 1 year.

resultsOf the 2,503 CCS patients who underwent randomisation, the ESC definition classified 1,264 (50.5%) as HIR and 1,239 (49.5%) as non-HIR. HIR patients displayed a higher risk of MACCE (3.9% vs 2.3%; p=0.015) and similar rates of BARC Type 2-5 bleeding (5.1% vs 5.7%; p=0.455) as compared to non-HIR patients. Ticagrelor monotherapy and ticagrelor-based DAPT were associated with similar risks of MACCE (HIR: 4.0% vs 3.8%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.85; non-HIR: 2.1% vs 2.6%, HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.38-1.66, p

conclusionsIn a post hoc analysis of the TWILIGHT trial that included CCS patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT appeared to be safe and was not associated with increased risks of ischaemic or bleeding events, regardless of baseline HIR status, compared with standard ticagrelor-based DAPT. These findings suggest the potential to expand guideline recommendations for ticagrelor monotherapy in CCS.

Indexed as

AspirinPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelorAgedChronic DiseaseDrug Therapy, CombinationDual Anti-Platelet TherapyFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAspirinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID40375766
PMCPMC12063552

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.