ReviewCureus2025
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence applications in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an analysis of emerging research trends.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to a computer system capable of performing complex tasks that require human skills. AI is increasingly being utilized in the healthcare sector; therefore, the aim of this review was to explore the role of AI in enhancing immediate response and successful management of cardiac arrest by improving the recognition of cardiac arrest from emergency calls in an out-of-hospital setting. The preferred design for this study was a literature review. To get the relevant articles, an in-depth literature search for primary and secondary studies was carried out over various databases, namely ProQuest, CINHAL, PUBMED, and Google Scholar. The results revealed that in five out of the 12 studies, there was a total of 98,922 participants. Three were reviews of past studies, and one involved the examination of a number of emergency calls, but the number of participants was not specified, while the other examined AI and self-care. A thematic analysis of the 10 articles was performed and four dominant themes were identified, namely AI improves self-care; AI improves clinical outcomes with a positive predictive value of (33.0%, p < 0.001); improved decision making with an accuracy of 0.908, which increases the survival rate with an accuracy of 0.896; and the prediction of cardiac arrest with an accuracy of 0.8 in predicting cardiovascular risks including cardiac arrest. Hence, it is concluded that the integration of AI facilitates the early prediction of potential cases of cardiac arrest in out-of-hospital settings. Early detection is associated with improved decision-making regarding the next action steps to take. AI enhances self-care, whereby through virtual doctors and online applications, patients can take proactive measures when they are susceptible to a heart attack. As a result, the integration of AI significantly improves patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.