Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40377134›Full record

ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

Comprehensive management of vulvovaginal cancers.

Angélica Nogueira-Rodrigues, Maaike H M Oonk, Domenica Lorusso, Brian Slomovitz, Mario M Leitão, Glauco Baiocchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comprehensive management of vulvovaginal cancers.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angélica Nogueira-RodriguesFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3405-8310
Maaike H M OonkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3261-3632
Domenica LorussoGynecology Oncology Program, Humanitas University San Pio X, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-0598
Brian SlomovitzDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7241-3096
Mario M LeitãoDivision of Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-3836
Glauco BaiocchiBrazilian Group of Gynecologic Oncology (EVA), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8193-5582

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvar and vaginal cancers represent rare malignancies, with an incidence of 2.7 per 100,000 women for vulvar cancer, predominantly affecting women older than 60 years, although rising rates are observed in younger demographics. Approximately 90% of vulvar cancers are squamous cell carcinoma and frequently are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Vaginal cancer, constituting less than 1% of all female cancers, similarly exhibit HPV-related trends. This review delineates the etiology, histopathology, and treatment strategies for carcinomas and vulvovaginal melanomas and sarcomas. Surgical intervention remains the primary treatment modality for vulvar cancer, involving tumor resection and inguinofemoral lymph node staging. For locally advanced vulvar carcinoma, chemoradiation is advised when exenterative surgery would be indicated. Recurrence rates within 2 years after diagnosis range from 12% to 37%. Unfortunately, systemic treatments for recurrent or metastatic disease are limited, with 5-year survival rates at approximately 20%. Current evidence primarily derives from retrospective studies or small phase 2 trials or otherwise is extrapolated from the treatment of cervical cancer. Enrollment in clinical trials is strongly advocated, along with prompt access to best supportive care to mitigate the effect of locoregional progression on quality of life. Moreover, the psychosocial implications of treatment on body image and sexuality necessitate careful consideration. Future HPV vaccination initiatives may reduce cancer incidence, although significant effects of such vaccination will manifest over decades, underscoring the urgent need to enhance treatment efficacy and minimize morbidity in vulvar and vaginal cancers.

Indexed as

Vaginal NeoplasmsVulvar NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMelanomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPapillomavirus Infectionsvulvovaginal carcinomavulvovaginal melanomavulvovaginal sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID40377134
PMCPMC12432818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.