ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2025
Diagnostic Performance of Sarcopenia Screening Tests in Chronic Lung Disease Patients.
Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Performance of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, SARC-F + EBM, and Ishii Score for Detecting Sarcopenia in Hospitalised Geriatric Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia trajectories and associated factors after lung transplantation: a growth mixture model study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting the occurrence of probable sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly patients with coronary artery disease: development and validation of a clinical model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Sarcopenia, the gradual decline in skeletal muscle mass (SMM), strength, and functionality, has negative health consequences such as premature death and disability. It is prevalent in chronic lung disease (CLD). Timely recognition of sarcopenia is required for focused therapy. This study sought to analyze the rate of sarcopenia in patients with CLD and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the sarcopenia screening tests: the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii tests. Materials and Methods: This study comprised individuals diagnosed with CLD and referred for pulmonary rehabilitation. Sarcopenia was evaluated based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria (EWGSOP and EWGSOP2), utilizing handgrip strength, SMM index, and gait speed. The diagnostic accuracy of screening tests (SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii) was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) in the Receiver Ooperating Ccharacteristics. Results: A total of 227 patients, with a mean age of 59.00 ± 13.98 years, of whom 50.7% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), were included. The rate of probable sarcopenia was 41.2%, confirmed sarcopenia 2.5%, and severe sarcopenia 0.5%. The Ishii test exhibited the highest sensitivity (71.59%) and specificity (90.48%) for probable sarcopenia (AUC: 0.810); it also showed 100% sensitivity and substantial specificity (78.57%, AUC: 0.893) for confirmed sarcopenia. Conclusion: Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in CLD patients, underscoring the need for routine screening. Among the screening tools, the Ishii test exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy, making it a valuable tool for early detection. Routine assessment and targeted interventions for sarcopenia could improve functional outcomes in CLD patients.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.