ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2025
Can the Early Warning Score (ANDC) Predict Tocilizumab Efficacy in Patients with COVID-19 Cytokine Storm?
Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic Factors and Clinical Prediction Score for Progressive Respiratory Failure in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients Treated with Tocilizumab: A Multicenter Study.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the Early Warning Score [ANDC (age (A), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR (N)), D-dimer (D), and CRP (C)] in predicting the treatment response in patients receiving tocilizumab for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related cytokine storm. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for patients treated with tocili- zumab for a cytokine storm related to COVID-19 between April 1, 2020, and April 1, 2021. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters within 24 hours before tocilizumab were recorded. 1.14 × (age - 20) (years) + 1.63 × NLR + 5.00 × D-dimer (mg/L) + 0.14 × C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L) was used as the formula for the ANDC score. The study population was divided into 2 groups: those who died within 28 days of receiving tocilizumab and those who recovered. A comparative analysis was conducted. Results: Within 28 days of tocilizumab treatment, 59 (35.32%) patients died. In comparison with living patients, deceased patients exhibited considerably higher levels of interleukin (IL)-6, lactate dehydro- genase (LDH), ANDC score, and CRP (P < .05). Lactate dehydrogenase was an independent predictor of response to tocilizumab treatment (P < .001) in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. In patients who did not receive steroid therapy before tocilizumab treatment, the ANDC score had the highest area under the curve (AUC). The optimal cut-off value was determined to be 92.56, with a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 60.61% (P < .001). In patients receiving steroids before tocilizumab, LDH had the highest AUC. The optimal cut-off value was 484.5 U/L (P < .001). Conclusion: Lactate dehydrogenase was identified as an independent predictor of response to tocili- zumab treatment. The ANDC score showed the highest AUC value in steroid-naïve patients before tocilizumab, whereas LDH showed the highest AUC value in patients receiving steroids before tocili- zumab. Both the ANDC score and LDH levels show potential as valuable tools to guide treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.