ArticlePloS one2025
"Take me seriously": A qualitative interview study exploring healthcare experiences of endometriosis patients.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Endometriosis pain research in Germany : ENDO-PAIN and StEPP-UPP-two new research consortia on endometriosis pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Self-Esteem in Women with Endometriosis: A Qualitative Study of Psychosocial Burden and Self-Esteem-Related Experiences.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GPs' perspectives on patients presenting with endometriosis symptoms: an interview study.BJGP open · 2026Article
- Information Needs of Women Affected by Endometriosis and Their Environment: Qualitative Results from Participatory Workshops.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Matrix Tropism Influences Endometriotic Cell Attachment Patterns.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
- Recent obstetrical and gynaecological care experiences and their sociodemographic and mental health correlates: A latent class analysis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndometriosis is a chronic disease associated with stigmatisation and delayed diagnoses. In order to create or improve positive healthcare encounters for patients, this study aimed to explore the experiences of women with endometriosis and to identify challenges and resources for these patients.
methodsQualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore lived experiences of endometriosis patients. A purposive sampling strategy was used, and patients were included if they had a laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis and at least one contact with the healthcare system in Hesse, Germany. Interviews were conducted between May and August 2023, transcribed, and analysed according to an interpretive phenomenological approach using MAXQDA 24.
resultsIn total, 21 women aged 23-54 years (median: 32 years) were interviewed. Three themes were identified, with ambivalence emerging as the common essence of experiences. Patients reported that their experiences were influenced by the role of the healthcare provider, described as either a source of support or an inhibitor in the treatment process. Additionally, patients reported that provider-patient-communication was characterised by both trivialisation and dismissal of symptoms, as well as empathic, encouraging interactions. Limits in the healthcare system, such as the allocation of specialised care, and resources like increased awareness of endometriosis, represented systemic influences on experiences.
conclusionThis study provides an insight into the ambivalent nature of healthcare experiences from the perspective of endometriosis patients and contributes to a better understanding of patients' needs in healthcare encounters, which may help to create a more positive healthcare experience for them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.