ReviewPLOS global public health2025
Tools and methods for cataract recognition in low-resource settings: A narrative review.
Review in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Ophthalmology Research Output Relative to Disease Burden and National Income, 2011-2021.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The effect of eye health system strengthening on the productivity of services: a before-and-after evaluation conducted in seven counties in Kenya.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cataracts are a leading cause of global blindness, with many low-resource populations having poor access to eye care. While much is known regarding surgical access and outcomes, less is understood about the initial detection of operable cataracts in low-resource settings. We performed a comprehensive literature review on existing and emerging cataract screening methods in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The search keywords were "cataract detection, diagnosis, assessment, and evaluation in low- and middle- income countries". 1,825 articles were identified and 62 were selected for final inclusion comprising reviews, meta-analyses, and original research studies. Only 12 studies proposed new cataract screening methods for low-income settings. We extracted data on the efficacy and cost-efficiency of these novel methods and compared them to existing conventional cataract diagnosis methods. 8 out of 12 original research works developed novel devices or imaging modalities such as low-cost ophthalmoscopes and retinal cameras for cataract detection. 7 studies leveraged non-ophthalmologist staff to test their methods, suggesting a potential benefit of employing additional personnel for cataract screening. 8 studies utilized tele-ophthalmology and artificial intelligence (AI) platforms with high cataract detection accuracy. Overall, rates of cataract diagnosis in LMICs can be increased through a multifaceted strategy involving low-cost, portable devices operated by local healthcare workers and augmented by telehealth or AI approaches. Such efforts can aid in addressing the disparity between cataract diagnosis and surgical intervention in low-resource environments. However, improvements in research infrastructure are needed to support such efforts and the ability to thoroughly evaluate new innovations.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.