ArticlePloS one2025
Gender differences in the association between weight-adjusted waist index and migraine: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morning Headaches as a Specific Obstructive Sleep Apnea Characteristic in a Large Sleep Clinic Population.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examines how weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) correlates with the occurrence of migraine in U.S. adults.
backgroundBeing overweight significantly increases the likelihood of experiencing migraines; nonetheless, conventional metrics like waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) might not completely capture the level of migraine risk tied to obesity. WWI integrates the strengths of WC while minimizing its correlation with BMI, which might make it a more accurate indicator of central obesity-related migraine susceptibility.
methodsThis study performed a cross-sectional analysis using data from 9,688 participants obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), covering the years 1999-2004. Migraine occurrence was evaluated through questionnaires, and participants' WWI was computed. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between WWI and migraines. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were applied to evaluate the dose-response relationship between WWI and migraines. Furthermore, interaction tests and subgroup analyses were executed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, paired with DeLong et al.'s test, was employed to compare the predictive power of WWI, BMI, and WC for migraines.
resultsThe overall prevalence of migraines was found to be 21.50% (weighted population: 31,888,075 out of 148,278,824). In Model 3, the link between WWI and migraines in women showed no statistical significance (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07). In this model, each unit increase in WWI among men was linked to a 22% higher risk of migraines (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05-1.42). When stratified by quintiles, individuals in the third quintile (Q3) displayed a 69% higher likelihood of experiencing migraines compared to those in the first quintile (Q1) (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.19-2.40), with a significant inflection point observed at 10.95 cm/√kg. Significant interactions were noted among various age groups (p for interaction = 0.018). WWI demonstrated a stronger predictive capability for migraine compared to BMI and WC.
conclusionA U-shaped positive correlation of WWI with migraines was observerd among adult males in the U.S., while no significant correlation was found in females. Within the context of BMI and WC, WWI exhibited a superior predictive capacity for migraines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.