Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379309›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Determining the key elements of community-based care for women and partners following a stillbirth or second trimester miscarriage: protocol for a realist synthesis.

Becky MacGregor, Helen Leach, Rachel Court, Amy Grove, Alexander Edward Heazell, Sarah Hillman, Sophie Staniszewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Becky MacGregorApplied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK b.macgregor@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9530-8387
Helen LeachWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0502-9844
Rachel CourtBirmingham Centre for Evidence and Implementation Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Amy GroveBirmingham Centre for Evidence and Implementation Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8027-7274
Alexander Edward HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-7845
Sarah HillmanApplied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3560-2074
Sophie StaniszewskaWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-9074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStillbirth and second trimester miscarriage have wide-reaching consequences for women, their partners and their families. There is currently little community-based care provision within the National Health Service for women and partners who have had a stillbirth or second trimester miscarriage. There is a research gap in the evidence to guide best practice. This review will seek to understand how, when and where this care is best delivered. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aim of this review is to identify the key elements of community-based care following a stillbirth or second trimester miscarriage. As this is a complex intervention, a realist approach will be used to establish for whom, how, when and where this care is best delivered. An initial programme theory will be constructed which will be tested against the available evidence and refined. A wide range of evidence including qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods and experiential knowledge will be identified through secondary sources, extracted and synthesised to develop and refine the programme theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will not require ethical approval as it does not involve primary data collection. The findings will be submitted for open-access publication to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to stakeholders. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024587365.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousCommunity Health ServicesStillbirthFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID40379309
PMCPMC12083345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.