Observational studyBMJ open2025
Physical activity levels, recreational screen time, sleep quality and mood among young adult healthcare students at an international university in Bahrain: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with psychological distress among newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer: A cross-sectional study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Screen Time and Behavioral Correlates Among Children in the United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Review
- Sleep Quality and Sex-Specific Physical Activity Benefits Predict Mental Health in Romanian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate levels of recreational physical activity, screen time, sleep quality and mood in undergraduate medicine and nursing students.
designObservational, cross-sectional study using an online survey administered during the academic term in 2024.
settingInternational Health Professions University in Bahrain.
participants279 undergraduate students from the school of medicine and school of nursing. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical activity levels (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form), recreational screen time (Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) and mood (Brief Mood Introspection Scale) were measured and compared across groups, and associations between measures were assessed.
resultsParticipants reported high rates of not meeting physical activity recommendations (46.6%), high levels of recreational screen time (median=32 hours per week) and poor-quality sleep (63.1%). Males reported higher levels of physical activity, screen time and sleep quality. Higher sleep quality was observed for the school of medicine, the preclinical stage of study and participants living alone. Overweight and obese participants had significantly higher recreational screen time and more unpleasant and tired moods. Higher levels of screen time and lower sleep quality were associated with tired, unpleasant and negative moods, while not meeting physical activity recommendations was associated with poor sleep in addition to unpleasant, tired and negative moods.
conclusionsPhysical activity levels are positively associated with mood and sleep quality in young adult healthcare students. Recreational screen time is negatively associated with mood but has no relationship with sleep quality. Intervention programmes to increase physical activity are warranted for young adults in healthcare training. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: Study data is available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.