Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379666›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sex differences in disease burden, utilization, and expenditure on primary health care services in Kerala, India.

Jaison Joseph, Hari Sankar, Santosh Kumar Sharma, Devaki Nambiar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Healthcare Utilization Patterns for Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness in an Urban Slum of Delhi: A Prospective Cohort Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaison JosephThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-8154
Hari SankarThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Santosh Kumar SharmaThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Devaki NambiarHealthier Societies, The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India. dnambiar@georgeinstitute.org.in.

Funding

The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance IA/CPHI/16/1/502653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex and gender are important determinants of health, conditioning health exposures and needs, health seeking behavior, health outcomes, and subsequent consequences. We aim to explore the nature and magnitude of sex differences in disease burden, service awareness, utilization, expenditure and satisfaction while accessing primary health care services in the light of recent primary care reforms implemented in the southern Indian state of Kerala. We conducted a cross-sectional study to explore the nature and magnitude of sex differences in disease burden, service awareness, utilization, expenditure and satisfaction in the public sector of Kerala, India. A household survey using multistage random sampling design was conducted to collect information from 3234 households in the selected eight PHC catchment areas of four districts in the state. Descriptive data analysis was carried out with a focus on disease burdens, place of care seeking, cost of care and patient satisfaction, using STATA 12. More males reported fever as their primary ailment compared to females (67.7% vs. 58.6%). A greater proportion of males as compared to females knew about the recently implemented reforms (43% vs 36%; p = 0.01). Allopathic (modern medicine) care was the most sought-after system of medicine across the sample. A higher proportion of females visited government primary health centres for outpatient care (34.7% vs. 27.5%; p = 0.00).Our analysis found statistically significant differences in the self reported cost of care in the private sector: 20 times greater than in public sector for males, whereas the difference was roughly five fold among females (Private: ₹650, $8.5 (95% CI ₹524, ₹776) vs. Public: ₹120, $1.58 (95%CI ₹17, ₹223, p < 0.001)). Males showed greater awareness of state health reforms than females, and high patient satisfaction existed for both private and public outpatient care across sex groups. We found significant sex differences in health system utilization and expenditure in Kerala, although our present analysis lacks data on trans, intersex and other sexual and gender minority groups. Further research on intersectionalities, such as care-seeking experiences across genders and socioeconomic groups, could enhance our understanding the role of sex in care seeking.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth ExpendituresPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSex FactorsYoung AdultDisease burdenGenderHealth Care Utilization: Health ExpenditureIndiaKeywordsPrimary Health Care Services

Identifiers

PMID40379666
PMCPMC12084306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.