ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Institutional Factors Associated with Equitable Cancer Care Provision for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations in Queensland, Australia: A Critical Race Theory Analysis.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer inequities for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) populations have been demonstrated in Australia. Historically, research has focused on individual factors, but addressing structural and institutional determinants is crucial for equitable care provision. This study utilised Critical Race Theory to examine institutional factors impacting equitable care provision.
methodsWe undertook a qualitative exploration of a large tertiary hospital in metropolitan Queensland. Institutional barriers, facilitators, and staff experiences regarding equitable care were explored through semi-structured interviews (n = 21). Participants included oncology registered nurses (n = 6), oncology doctors (n = 5), specialist nurses (n = 7), and executive-level staff (n = 3). Data were analysed using The Framework Method.
resultsFindings revealed an inflexible health system with strong deficit framing of CALD patients. A reliance on assumptions and informal mechanisms to address the needs of CALD patients resulted in suboptimal practises such as simplified information sharing, use of unqualified interpreters, limited treatment access, and avoidance of psycho-social discussions. Staff reported experiencing moral conflict when providing care discordant with their professional values.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the need for cultural and structural reform within Australian health services. Adapting services to promote equity will have demonstrable benefits for patient outcomes, quality of care, and staff wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.