Observational studyJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Secondary surgery and mortality following primary treatment for acetabular fractures - an observational study from Swedish national quality registers.
Observational study in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Outcomes of Surgical Management of Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures: A Prospective Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Isolated screw fixation of posterior wall fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of acetabular fractures ranges from non-operative with no restrictions in mobilisation to some of the more complex operative treatments in orthopaedics. Treatment strategies are developing, and outcomes need to be studied continuously. The study's primary aim was to assess the rate of secondary treatment in patients with acetabular fractures treated non-operatively or operatively. A secondary aim was to study mortality.
methodsData were retrieved from the Swedish Fracture Register and cross-referenced with the Swedish Arthroplasty Register for all patients aged ≥ 18 years with an acetabular fracture between 2014 and 2023. Patients were divided into three primary treatment groups: non-operative treatment, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) with/without combined ORIF (THA/combined hip procedure, CHP). The study examined mortality rates within each treatment group.
resultsOf the 3318 patients included in the study, 74% were treated non-operatively, 18% with ORIF, and 8% with THA/CHP. 4% of non-operatively treated patients and 17% of patients treated with ORIF had been converted to THA at 5 years, 12% of patients with THA as primary treatment had been revised. Patients who underwent THA as their initial treatment were more likely to undergo secondary treatment early. However, in those initially treated with ORIF the prevalence of secondary treatment increased after the first year. The non-operatively treated group had the highest mortality rate (19% at 1 year), followed by the THA group (14% at 1 year).
conclusionsThis observational nationwide register study on acetabular fractures shows that surgically treated patients have a relatively high reoperation rate. Younger patients are predominately treated with ORIF and display low mortality rates. Older patients with complex fracture patterns may benefit from primary treatment with THA/CHP being more frequently performed compared to prevailing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.