ArticleScientific reports2025
Channel equalization in ultraviolet communication based on LSTM-DNN hybrid model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet Communication (UVC) faces the challenge of increased Bit Error Rate (BER) due to signal attenuation caused by atmospheric scattering. In recent years, wireless optical communication technologies have made significant progress in both Ultraviolet (UV) and Visible Light (VL) communication domains. However, traditional channel equalization methods still exhibit limitations when handling complex nonlinear channels. This study proposes a Long Short-Term Memory - Deep Neural Network (LSTM-DNN)-based channel equalization approach to enhance signal recovery accuracy. The model leverages LSTM to process temporal dependencies and combines it with DNN for nonlinear feature extraction, thereby improving its adaptability to single-scattering channels. Experimental results demonstrate that the LSTM-DNN model shows significant advantages in improving signal recovery accuracy and transmission quality compared to conventional methods. These methods include Least Mean Squares (LMS), Recursive Least Squares (RLS), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Minimum Mean Squared Error (MMSE). Specifically, the LSTM-DNN model outperforms traditional methods across key performance metrics such as BER and Mean Squared Error (MSE). When the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) is 0 dB, the LSTM-DNN model achieves a BER of 0.135, significantly lower than LMS (0.45), RLS (0.38), PSO (0.35), SVM (0.25), and MMSE (0.20). As SNR increases, the LSTM-DNN model's BER further decreases, demonstrating strong robustness. When the SNR is 20 dB, the BER of the LSTM-DNN model drops to 0.015, substantially outperforming conventional methods. Additionally, the LSTM-DNN model exhibits the smallest MSE values, with 0.035 at 0 dB SNR and decreasing to 0.004 with higher SNR. On average, the LSTM-DNN model reduces BER by approximately 67.8% and MSE by about 70.8% compared to traditional methods. These results confirm that the LSTM-DNN model significantly improves signal recovery accuracy and transmission quality in UVC systems. Overall, the LSTM-DNN model demonstrates superior performance in UVC applications compared to conventional methods, offering higher precision and stability. This study effectively addresses signal attenuation issues in UVC, significantly enhancing signal recovery accuracy and transmission quality, thus possessing important theoretical value and practical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.