ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
From routine to selective: how updated MRI guidelines reshape gadolinium use in Germany.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MSpine: a prospective longitudinal study of spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis: MRI monitoring and prognostic factors for active disease. A study protocol.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Harmonized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multiple sclerosis: HARMONY-MS, a pilot project.Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critical diagnostic tool and monitoring modality for multiple sclerosis (MS), frequently employing gadolinium-based contrast agents (Gd). However, concerns regarding the accumulation of Gd have prompted international guidelines (MAGNIMS-CMSC-NAIMS, 2021) to advocate for the limitation of Gd utilization. Consequently, we assessed of the impact of the 2021 guidelines on the use of Gd in MRI in MS patients in Germany by conducting a retrospective analysis of MRI data from 12,833 MS patients in the German MS Register (2019-2024). Generalized additive models were employed to analyze Gd use trends over time by MRI type (cranial, spinal, combined). From 2020 to 2024, a significant decline in Gd use was observed, with percentages dropping from 74.2 to 41.2% in cranial MRI, from 78.2 to 39.2% in spinal MRI and from 81.8 to 59.0% in combined MRI (p < 0.001). The most substantial decline occurred within the initial five years of MS. Gd use in MS MRI scans has significantly decreased in line with the updated guidelines. Nevertheless, its persistent utilization in over one-third of cases necessitates further examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.