ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
A deep-learning model for predicting post-stroke cognitive impairment based on brain network damage.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal dynamic hierarchical clustering model for post-stroke cognitive impairment prediction.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a common and severe complication following acute lacunar stroke (ALS). Due to the limitations of current assessment tools and imaging methods, the early diagnosis of PSCI within 3 months of ALS remaining challenging. This study aimed to develop an effective, reliable, and accurate deep-learning method to predict PSCI within 3 months of ALS. Methods: In total, 100 ALS patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 39 were diagnosed with PSCI and 61 were non-PSCI. First, we quantified three-dimensional (3D) gray-matter damage and white-matter tract disconnection, providing both regional damage (RD) and structural disconnection (SDC) higher-dimensional insights into brain network disruption. Second, we developed a novel deep-learning model based on ResNet18, integrating 3D RD, SDC, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to provide a comprehensive analysis of brain network integrity and predict PSCI. Finally, we compared the performance of our method with other methods, and visualized brain network damage associated with PSCI. Results: Our model showed strong predictive performance and had a mean accuracy (ACC) of 0.820±0.024, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.795±0.068, a sensitivity (SEN) of 0.746±0.121, a specificity (SPE) of 0.869±0.044, and a F1-score (F1) of 0.760±0.050 in the five-fold cross-validation, outperforming existing models. In the PSCI patients, brain network damage significantly affected the salience, default mode, and somatic motor networks. Conclusions: This study not only established a model that can accurately predict PSCI, it also identified potential targets for symptom-based treatments, offering new insights into PSCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.