ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Automatic segmentation of calibration device boundaries on ophthalmic optical biometry instruments in optical coherence tomography images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the use of ophthalmic optical biometers in clinical practice has increased, so too has the demand for higher standards in evaluating ocular metrics. Among these metrics, the measurement of the ocular axial length (AL) is a critical task that often requires calibrated devices. Thus, efficient algorithms need to be developed to improve calibration mechanisms and ensure precise measurements. This study aimed to establish an algorithm to determine the pixel heights (PHs) of the boundary vertices of a calibration device in ophthalmic optical biometers to improve the accuracy and repeatability of ocular AL measurements in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Methods: The algorithm employs a series of image morphological processing techniques to delineate the rough boundaries of the calibration device in OCT images. After extracting boundary points, clustering techniques are applied to simplify the data. These clustered boundary points are analyzed for characteristic parameters to refine the boundaries. Finally, a fitting process is used to determine the PHs of the vertices, and performance is then evaluated by tests measuring the repeatability and recognition accuracy of the algorithm. Results: The proposed method had high repeatability in locating the boundaries of the front and rear sections of the calibration device, and had repeatability deviations not exceeding 0.36 pixels and 0.18 pixels, respectively. Additionally, linear fitting of the computed sub-PH and optical path difference yielded determination coefficients of 0.9998330 and 0.9999863, respectively, indicating an almost perfectly linear relationship. This high degree of linearity demonstrates the exceptional accuracy of the method in locating the calibration device boundaries. These results provide a heuristic approach for the future boundary localization of calibration devices in OCT images for biometers, offering a robust and reliable framework for enhancing calibration precision in ophthalmic optical biometry. Conclusions: The developed algorithm provides an effective and reliable method for determining the PHs of calibration device vertices in ophthalmic optical biometers. With its high accuracy and repeatability, this valuable tool could enhance ocular AL measurements and improve the overall quality of ocular assessments in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.