Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384742›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2025

Immunosuppression Management in Heart Transplantation.

Marlena Habal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Heart Transplant: A Never-Ending Story.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marlena HabalNew York University, Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-9822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While advances in immunosuppression management have led to excellent 1-year survival after heart transplantation, long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Contemporary therapies are associated with adverse sequalae, dominated by chronic kidney disease, and concomitantly by the inadequate control of humoral alloimmunity that is tightly linked to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The dichotomy between the need for less toxicity and better control of humoral alloimmunity has driven a search for more effective regimens and for strategies to reverse humoral responses. This review provides an overview of immunosuppression in heart transplantation, beginning with critical historical context and followed by basic immunological principles underlying contemporary immunosuppression, the evolution of therapies over the past decade, and considerations for strategies to mitigate humoral alloimmunity. Perspective on the state-of-the field in the current era and considerations for future directions are also provided.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionGraft SurvivalHeart TransplantationImmunosuppressive AgentsHumansImmunity, HumoralRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive Agentscostimulationheart transplanthumoral alloimmunityimmunosuppressionrejection

Identifiers

PMID40384742
PMCPMC12082473

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.