ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion for Patients with Invasive Fungal Disease and Febrile Neutropenia: A Registry-Based, Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-World Study.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion in the treatment of mucormycosis: a real-world observation.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion Is Effective and Safe for the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Chinese Patients with Hematologic Disease: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational, Real-World Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) in treating patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD) or febrile neutropenia. Patients and Methods: This study retrospectively included patients diagnosed with IFD or febrile neutropenia who received ABCD treatment from 22 hospitals. The efficacy and safety were evaluated at the end of ABCD treatment. The characteristics of patients diagnosed with possible, probable and proven IFD according to the revised EORTC-MSG criteria were then further analyzed to conduct sensitivity analysis. Results: A total of 503 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 391 received ABCD treatment for a minimum of seven days, and the overall efficacy of ABCD was determined to be 71.87% (281/391). 183 patients were diagnosed with possible, probable and proven IFD, the ABCD efficacy of whom was 67.76% (124/183). The efficacy of ABCD in patients with hematologic malignancies, AIDS and diabetes was 70.10% (211/301), 88.24% (30/34), and 83.33% (10/12), respectively. In terms of various fungal species, the efficacy of ABCD in patients with Conclusion: ABCD has demonstrated satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and safety in the treatment of IFD or febrile neutropenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.