Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385328›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Analysis of surgical volume and short-term outcomes for upper gastrointestinal cancer post-COVID-19: Evidence from a nationwide Japanese database.

Masashi Takeuchi, Hideki Endo, Taizo Hibi, Ryo Seishima, Yusuke Takemura, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Hiromichi Maeda, Akinobu Taketomi, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Yasuyuki Seto and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Masashi TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3797-432X
Hideki EndoDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0052-0332
Taizo HibiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6867-228X
Ryo SeishimaDepartment of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8892-4173
Yusuke TakemuraDepartment of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3791-9902
Hiroyuki YamamotoDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Hiromichi MaedaDepartment of Surgery Kochi Medical School Kochi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-8082
Akinobu TaketomiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I Hokkaido University Hospital Hokkaido Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiDatabase Committee The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0241
Yasuyuki SetoNational Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-8752
Hideki UenoDatabase Committee The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-1199
Masaki MoriTokai University Tokyo Japan.
Ken ShirabeDepartment of General Surgical Science Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine Gunma Japan.
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Previous studies indicated that short-term outcomes for gastroenterological surgeries did not worsen during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it remains unclear whether surgical volumes and medical resource use have recovered postpandemic. This study examines pre- and postpandemic trends in upper gastrointestinal surgeries, including esophagectomy and gastrectomy, and their short-term outcomes. Methods: Data from the Japan's National Clinical Database (NCD) were analyzed for patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2018 and December 2023. We evaluated changes in surgical volume, intensive care unit (ICU) use, morbidity, mortality rates, and the standardized morbidity and mortality ratio (SMR)-a comparison of observed versus expected outcomes using an NCD-established risk calculator. Key metrics included 30d mortality, surgical mortality, and four major morbidities like pneumonia and anastomotic leakage. Results: Esophagectomy volumes remained stable from 2018 to 2023, while gastrectomy volumes decreased notably over the past 6 y. The proportion of patients over 70 increased significantly in both surgery types. Morbidity and mortality rates showed no significant deterioration postpandemic, as indicated by SMR values. Conclusions: This study analyzed changes in surgical volume and short-term outcomes for upper gastrointestinal cancer in the post-COVID-19 era using a Japanese nationwide database. It found that surgical treatments for gastrectomy and esophagectomy remained safe even after the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID‐19esophageal canceresophagectomygastrectomygastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID40385328
PMCPMC12080200

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.