ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Effectiveness of advanced dressings in preventing surgical site infections compared to that of standard dressings in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis for guideline revision by the Japanese Society for Surgical Infection.
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocompatibility and antibacterial properties of ordered PLA fiber membranes fabricated via electrospinning technology.iScience · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of advanced dressings in preventing surgical site infections compared to that of standard dressings in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis for guideline revision by the Japanese Society for Surgical Infection.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of wound coverage using advanced dressings specifically for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) in gastrointestinal surgery, as part of the update of the SSI prevention guidelines of the Japan Society for Surgical Infection (JSSI). Methods: After searching CENTRAL, PubMed, and ICHUSHI-Web in July 2024, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing advanced dressings and standard dressings for surgical wounds in gastrointestinal surgery (PROSPERO No. CRD42024569084). Three authors independently screened the RCTs. We assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the body of evidence for the extracted data. The primary outcome was superficial SSI, and the secondary outcomes were length of postoperative hospital stay, costs, and allergy. This study was partially supported by the JSSI. Results: A total of seven RCTs and 927 patients were included. The use of advanced dressings significantly lowered the risk of SSI compared to that associated with standard dressings (risk ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence intervals: 0.34-0.88). The certainty of the evidence was rated as moderate. According to the subgroup analysis, advanced dressings reduced the risk of SSI in colorectal surgery. Advanced dressings did not reduce the length of postoperative hospital stay or costs compared to that of standard dressings. Allergies were reported in only one patient using silver-impregnated dressings. Conclusion: The use of advanced dressings for primary wounds in gastrointestinal surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of SSI than that associated with standard dressings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.