ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
The Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Suicidality: An Updated Systematic Review.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) have a substantial global burden, with over 14 million individuals attempting suicide annually. Existing biological therapies do not adequately reduce STB risk. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an approved, non-invasive and low-risk treatment for several psychiatric disorders. Meta-analyses investigating TMS' effects on STB indicate therapeutic promise. Given the proliferation of TMS studies investigating its effect on STB, a repeat review of the literature is warranted. Methods: A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS in reducing STB. Studies assessing STB outcomes following rTMS to treat psychiatric disorders, either as monotherapy or adjunctive treatment, were included. Forty-five studies were identified ( Results: Studies generally applied rTMS to treat primary psychiatric disorders, particularly depression, with change in suicidality evaluated as a secondary outcome. rTMS protocols differed across studies. Most studies targeted the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), although significant improvements to STB were also reported with rTMS targeting the visual cortex, right dlPFC and the bilateral PFC. High frequency rTMS and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) protocols were superior in reducing STB compared to other stimulation protocols, with studies reporting 40-100% treatment response rates. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild and transient. Conclusion: rTMS appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for STB, with significant reductions observed, particularly when rTMS or iTBS is applied to the dlPFC. Mechanistically informed randomized controlled trials specifically designed to evaluate rTMS' treatment effects on STB are needed to validate this promising treatment approach.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.