ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Implementing Learning Health System Principles to Advance the Evaluation and Treatment of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early intervention for individuals with clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) aims to prevent the onset of serious mental illnesses like schizophrenia, but models for specialized care remain underdeveloped. We describe the development, feasibility, and value of a CHR-P evaluation and treatment program built on learning health system principles. We demonstrate that referral and intake clinical assessment data can improve the characterization and identification of individuals with CHR-P. Methods: The Resilience Evaluation-Social Emotional Training (RE-SET) Program, developed as part of a continuum of psychosis care programs at Massachusetts General Hospital, systematically collects clinical data at referral, intake evaluation, and during treatment. In this study, at referral, providers, caregivers, and/or patients reported on the patient's psychiatric history. Patients for whom there were concerns for attenuated psychosis were eligible for evaluation. Prior to diagnostic evaluation, patients completed self-report measures of a broad range of psychiatric symptoms. Patients were evaluated with the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) to determine if they met CHR-P criteria. Using referral and intake data from 118 help-seeking individuals, we performed univariate chi-square or independent samples t-test to identify factors associated with CHR-P syndrome. Results: Ninety-nine (99) individuals with complete referral data were included in the analysis (mean age: 17.8 years; SD: 4). Almost a quarter (24.2%) met CHR-P criteria on the SIPS. Referred individuals presented with high rates of psychiatric comorbidity, previous psychiatric treatment, and functional impairment across multiple domains. Significant predictors (p<.05) of CHR-P syndrome included: history of autism spectrum disorder, endorsing more than one psychotic symptom, reduced sleep duration, and more severe cognitive and behavioral difficulties. Conclusions: Identification of CHR-P may be improved with greater attention to developmental history, psychotic symptoms, sleep disturbance, and cognitive and behavioral difficulties. Integrating routine assessment into clinical care provides data-driven opportunities to improve the identification and treatment of CHR-P.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.