ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Development and Validation of a Multi-Task Artificial Intelligence-Assisted System for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a multi-task artificial intelligence-assisted system for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) based on various Transformer neural network architectures. The system integrates lesion recognition, cumulative time statistics, and progress bar marking functions to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of endoscopic image interpretation while effectively reducing missed diagnoses. Methods: A dataset comprising 12 annotated categories of images captured by three different brands of capsule endoscopy devices was collected. Transfer learning and fine-tuning were conducted on five pre-trained Transformer models. Performance metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and recognition speed, were evaluated to select the best-performing model. The optimal model was converted from PyTorch to Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) format. Using OpenCV and MMCV tools, a multi-task SBCE-assisted reading system was developed. Results: A total of 34,799 images were included in the study. The best-performing model, FocalNet, achieved a weighted average sensitivity of 85.69%, specificity of 98.58%, accuracy of 85.69%, and an AUC of 0.98 across all categories. Its diagnostic accuracy outperformed junior physicians ( Conclusion: The multi-task SBCE-assisted reading system developed using Transformer networks demonstrated rapid and accurate classification of various small bowel lesions. It holds significant potential in enhancing diagnostic efficiency and image review speed for endoscopists. However, the AI system has not yet been validated in prospective clinical trials, and further real-world studies are needed to confirm its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.