Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387141›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2025

Optimizing larval mass-rearing techniques for Aedes mosquitoes: enhancing production and quality for genetic control strategies.

Wadaka Mamai, Cécile Brengues, Hamidou Maiga, Thomas Wallner, Anthony Herbin, Mathieu Whiteside, Simran Singh Kotla, Odet Bueno-Masso, Nanwintoum Sévérin Bimbilé Somda, Zhiyong Xi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Larval diet-mediated morphological trait andFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wadaka MamaiInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria - Institut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement (IRAD), PO Box 2123, Yaoundé, Cameroun.
Cécile BrenguesUMR Mivegec (Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs : Écologie, Génétique, Évolution et Contrôle), IRD-CNRS-Université de Montpellier, Représentation IRD la Réunion - PTU, 97495 Sainte Clotilde Cedex, La Réunion, France.
Hamidou MaigaInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria - Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale de l'Ouest (IRSS/DRO), 01 PO Box 545 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0001-8662-4700
Thomas WallnerInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria.
Anthony HerbinUMR Mivegec (Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs : Écologie, Génétique, Évolution et Contrôle), IRD-CNRS-Université de Montpellier, Représentation IRD la Réunion - PTU, 97495 Sainte Clotilde Cedex, La Réunion, France.ORCID 0009-0003-7851-7632
Mathieu WhitesideUMR Mivegec (Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs : Écologie, Génétique, Évolution et Contrôle), IRD-CNRS-Université de Montpellier, Représentation IRD la Réunion - PTU, 97495 Sainte Clotilde Cedex, La Réunion, France.ORCID 0009-0009-9617-9730
Simran Singh KotlaInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria.
Odet Bueno-MassoInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria.
Nanwintoum Sévérin Bimbilé SomdaInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria - Unité de Formation et de Recherche en Science et Technologie (UFR/ST), Université Norbert Zongo (UNZ), BP 376, Koudougou, Burkina Faso.
Zhiyong XiGuangzhou Wolbaki Biotech Co. Ltd., 510530, Guangzhou, China - Department of Microbiology, Genetics, & Immunology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-4320, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7786-012X
Hanano YamadaInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria.
Chantel Janet de BeerInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria.
Jérémy BouyerInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria - ASTRE, Cirad, INRAE, Univ. Montpellier, Plateforme Technologique CYROI, 97491, Sainte-Clotilde, La Réunion, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1913-416X

Funding

Cirad and IRD OptisUnited States of America to IAEA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantity and quality of laboratory-reared insects are pivotal for the success of any sterile male-release program. Optimizing larval mass-rearing methods to enhance both production and quality in Aedes mosquitoes is essential to meet the growing demand from FAO/IAEA Member States for the sterile insect technique (SIT) as a component of area-wide integrated pest management to control or suppress disease vectors. This study was designed to identify the most effective feeding regime and schedule that maximize pupae production with a single tilt/sorting event and to evaluate an alternative larval-rearing unit. The results demonstrated that ingredient particle size, mosquito strain and feeding regime significantly influenced insect production and quality, underscoring the critical need to account for these factors in mass-rearing operations. A daily feeding regime of 0.17, 0.33, 0.67, 0.67 and 0.5 mg per larva was identified as optimal for both species (Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus) achieving up to 80 ± 2.5% male pupae recovery rate when sorted 48 h after the onset of pupation. Production outcomes were not compromised with the exclusion of feeding on Days 2 and 3. Furthermore, under the conditions of this study, the Wolbaki rack (Model WBK-P0003-V2) was shown to be sufficient for mass-rearing Aedes mosquitoes. Finally, a 4-day feeding regime was implemented in a field program on Reunion island, yielding similar pupae recovery rates and contamination as the reference regime, a significant step toward improving cost-efficiency and scaling-up the program. These findings provide valuable information for refining standard operating procedures (SOPs) for mass-rearing, thereby enhancing the efficiency and scalability of SIT programs.

Indexed as

AedesMosquito ControlPest Control, BiologicalAnimalsFemaleLarvaMaleMosquito VectorsParticle SizePupaDiet ingredientFeeding regimePupationRearing-unitSterile insect technique

Identifiers

PMID40387141
PMCPMC12087348

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.