ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
A constant pH molecular dynamics and experimental study on the effect of different pH on the structure of urease from Sporosarcina pasteurii.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seawater-derived ureolytic Vibrio sp. strain F-11 as a microbial agent for calcium carbonate biomineralization.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Structural landscape of bacterial urease: implications for catalyst and adaptation.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Experimental Verification of Calcite Formation Potential by Ureolytic and Non-Ureolytic Bacterial Strains in Geopolymer Mortar.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextUrease is pivotal in microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP), where its catalytic efficiency directly governs calcium carbonate formation. However, practical MICP applications in extreme environments (e.g., acidic mine drainage, industrial waste sites) are hindered by limited understanding of urease behavior under extreme pH conditions. This study combines laboratory experiments and constant pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) simulations to investigate how pH variations (3-11) affect the structural stability of Sporosarcina pasteurii urease, focusing on its α-subunit (PDB: 4CEU). Experimental validation identified pH 7-8 as optimal for urease activity, aligning with molecular dynamics results showing minimal structural deviations (RMSD) and stable protonation states under neutral to mildly alkaline conditions. Extreme pH (3, 4, 11) disrupted active-site geometry and induced charge fluctuations, impairing catalytic function. CpHMD simulations revealed that the α-subunit retains structural integrity at pH 7-8, suggesting potential reassembly post-environmental stress. This work bridges gaps in enzymatic stability under harsh conditions, offering insights for optimizing MICP in geotechnical and environmental remediation applications.
methodsThe study combined experimental and computational approaches. Sporosarcina pasteurii urease activity was experimentally assessed across pH 3-11 by monitoring urea hydrolysis-induced conductivity changes. Computational analyses employed GROMACS constant pH with the CHARMM36 force field to perform pH-dependent molecular dynamics simulations. The urease structure was solvated, neutralized, energy-minimized, and subjected to constant pH simulations. Structural stability, active site dynamics, and protonation states of titratable residues were analyzed via RMSD, hydrogen bonds, solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), and Epock 1.0.5. Free energy landscapes and residue interactions were evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA) and λ-dynamics. Experimental data were processed with OriginPro 2024b and Python, linking pH-induced conformational shifts to enzymatic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40387959What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.