Evidence mapPaperPMID 40388264Full record

ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2025

Proteomics Approaches to Ecoimmunology: New Insights into Wildlife Immunity and Disease.

Amanda Vicente-Santos, Natalia Sandoval-Herrera, Gábor Á Czirják, Benjamin A Neely, Daniel J Becker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda Vicente-SantosSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-2059
Natalia Sandoval-HerreraDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2546-8983
Gábor Á CzirjákDepartment of Wildlife Diseases, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin 10315, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9488-0069
Benjamin A NeelyChemical Sciences Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6120-7695
Daniel J BeckerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4315-8628

Funding

The macrophage/tuft cell SUCNR1 axis in neonatal intestinal inflammationP20GM134973 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · 2022 to 2025
$11.0M
Beyond discovery: bat behavior and virus shedding as drivers of spillover riskR01AI185127 · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · 2025 to 2025
$701k
Company of Biologists EA1067Human Frontier Science Program RGP002/2023National Science Foundation DBI 2515340NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI185127NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134973NIH HHS P20GM134973NIH HHS R01AI185127Society for Integrative and Comparative BiologySwedish University of Agricultural Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding wildlife immune responses is crucial for assessing disease risks, environmental stress effects, and conservation challenges. Traditional ecoimmunology approaches rely on targeted assays, which, while informative, often provide a fragmented and species-limited view of immune function. Proteomics offers a powerful alternative by enabling the high-throughput, system-wide quantification of immune-related proteins, providing a functional perspective on immunity that overcomes many limitations of conventional methods. However, proteomics remains underutilized in ecoimmunology despite its potential to enhance biomarker discovery, host-pathogen interaction studies, and environmental health assessments. This perspective highlights proteomics as a transformative tool for ecoimmunology, disease ecology, and conservation biology. We discuss its unique advantages over other -omics approaches, including its ability to capture realized immune function rather than inferred gene expression, its applicability to diverse wildlife taxa, and its potential for longitudinal immune monitoring of individuals using minimally invasive sampling. We also address key challenges, including limited genomic reference resources, sample constraints, reproducibility issues, and the need for standardized protocols. To overcome these barriers, we propose practical solutions, such as leveraging proteomes of closely related species for annotation and using their annotated genomes as search spaces for peptide mapping. Additionally, we highlight the importance of alternative quality control strategies and improved data-sharing practices to enhance the utility of proteomics in wildlife research. To fully integrate proteomics into ecoimmunology, we recommend expanding public reference databases for non-model species, refining field-adapted workflows, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration between ecologists, immunologists, and bioinformaticians. By embracing these advancements, the field can leverage proteomics to bridge the gap between molecular mechanisms and ecological processes, ultimately improving our ability to monitor wildlife health, predict disease risks, and inform conservation strategies in the face of environmental change.

Indexed as

Animals, WildProteomicsAnimalsConservation of Natural Resources

Identifiers

PMID40388264
PMCPMC12690462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.