ArticleEndocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)2025
Exploring Sex Differences in Type 2 Diabetes via a Male-Dominant Beta-Cell Cluster from Single-Cell Pancreatic Sequencing of Public Datasets.
Article in Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toll-like receptor 2 modulates age-associated insulitis and fibrotic remodeling of Langerhans islets.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Article
- Biological sex affects human islet gene expression and mitochondrial function in type 2 diabetes.Endocrinology · 2026Article
- Biological sex affects human islet gene expression and mitochondrial function in type 2 diabetes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Exploring Sex-Specific Mechanisms in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Single-Cell Analysis in Pancreatic Islets.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgruoundType 2 diabetes is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by insulin resistance and progressive beta-cell dysfunction. Although sex differences in type 2 diabetes prevalence, progression, and complications have been reported, the molecular mechanisms underlying these differences remain largely unknown. We aimed to utilize single-cell RNA sequencing to identify a beta-cell cluster that is more prevalent in males than in females and exhibits distinct gene expression patterns, gene set enrichment profiles, and cell-cell communication compared to other clusters.
methodsFASTQ files from four public datasets were preprocessed, aligned to the human genome (GRCh38), and integrated into a high-quality matrix to mitigate batch effects. We focused on beta-cells from type 2 diabetes patients, performed trajectory inference to identify clusters, and conducted differential gene expression and gene set enrichment analyses. These findings were validated using bulk RNA-seq datasets. Additionally, cell-cell communication analysis was performed to identify ligand-receptor interactions, followed by a sensitivity analysis to assess sex-specific differences.
resultsWe identified a male-dominant beta-cell cluster (adjusted P value=4.2×10-6) that displayed unique gene expression patterns and downregulation of pathways associated with protein metabolism and insulin synthesis. Differentially expressed genes (e.g., interleukin 24 [IL24], regulator of G protein signaling like 1 [RGSL1]) were confirmed through bulk analysis. Moreover, the cluster demonstrated distinct communication patterns with other cell types, underscoring sex-specific differences.
conclusionWe have identified a male-dominant beta-cell cluster characterized by distinct gene expression, signaling pathways, and cell interactions. These findings provide insights into the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and may inform the development of more effective, sex-specific therapeutic strategies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.