Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389434›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2025

Controlled preparation of fish oil powders via complex coacervation and genipin crosslinking.

Lijia Chen, Wenjie Zhang, Qiqi Bian, Xichang Wang, Jian Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lijia ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenjie ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qiqi BianShanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xichang WangNational R&D Branch Center for Freshwater Aquatic Products Processing Technology (Shanghai), Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic-Product Processing and Preservation, College of Food Science & Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.
Jian ZhongShanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. jzhong@shsmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272338Shanghai Municipal Health Commission GWVI- 11.2-XD19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of fish oil is limited by its unpleasant fishy flavour, sensitivity to environments (e.g., oxygen, light, and heat), and poor water solubility. The complex coacervation-based encapsulation of fish oil in powders is a promising method to improve the behavior of fish oil in food science and engineering. Controlled preparation of fish oil powders has become an important topic in improving their properties. Herein, the fish oil-encapsulated powders were controlled prepared by combining a fish gelatin (FG)-alginate complex coacervation method with an intra-particulate genipin-crosslinking method. The genipin crosslinking did not affect the particle morphologies, moisture contents, and fish oil encapsulation ability. However, it did affect other physicochemical properties, fish oil oxidation ability, and in vitro digestion behaviors. Especially, the genipin-to-FG mass ratio of 1.0% induced the lowest water activity (0.45 ± 0.01), highest tapped density (0.107 ± 0.007 g/cm

Identifiers

PMID40389434
PMCPMC12089318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.