Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390050›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

Exploring the facilitators and barriers to achieving universal health coverage in Uganda: a qualitative study of the free healthcare policy.

Prossy Kiddu Namyalo, Cyndirela Chadambuka, Lisa Forman, Beverley M Essue, Freddie Ssengooba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prossy Kiddu NamyaloInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada. pk.namyalo@mail.utoronto.ca.
Cyndirela ChadambukaInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Lisa Forman *Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Beverley M Essue *Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Freddie Ssengooba *School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

International Doctoral Research Award (IDRA) 2022 IDRC-IDRA Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical variations often occur between a state's initial public policy goals and its implementation outcomes. After two decades, the implementation of the free healthcare policy in Uganda has not achieved the desired outcomes, and there is a lack of comprehensive contextual analysis applying implementation science approaches in the identification of barriers and facilitators. This study explores barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the free healthcare policy, drawing on the retrospective experiences of policymakers, policy advocates, policy supporters or influencers, policy implementers, and policy beneficiaries.

methodsWe employed an exploratory qualitative study design and conducted 27 semi-structured interviews with key informants and 16 focus groups with users. Perspectives on implementation over time were collected by incorporating questions relating to the policy implementation journey from inception to 2023. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided data analysis to categorize and examine the barriers and facilitators to implementation. Two coders independently coded the data, which were thematically analysed with NVivo.14.

resultsA total of five main factors were identified, synthesized, and categorized as barriers and facilitators with overlaps, namely: (i) financial resources, (ii) medicines and supply system, (iii) health human resources, (iv) infrastructure and functionality, and (v) equity and the FHP Implementation.

conclusionsFindings illustrate that policy implementation gaps are due to limited resources, political will that does not translate into sufficient allocation of funds, and incremental policy shifts that are not driving meaningful improvement in the health system. The findings explain why the free healthcare policy implementation has been unsuccessful and highlight the importance of investing in resources to support meaningful progress towards universal health coverage.

Indexed as

Health PolicyUniversal Health InsuranceDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPolicy MakingQualitative ResearchUganda

Identifiers

PMID40390050
PMCPMC12090541

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.