Evidence mapPaperPMID 40390819Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2025

Fresh Versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure.

Saeideh Dashti, Sahereh Arabian, Robab Davar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saeideh DashtiResearch and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi, University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Sahereh ArabianAbnormal Uterine Bleeding Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Robab DavarResearch and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi, University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To compare the outcomes of fresh embryo transfer (ET) versus frozen ET (FET) in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute. A total of 498 cycles, including 418 FET cycles and 80 fresh cycles, from women with RIF were reviewed between February 2020 and February 2023. The chemical and clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rate were compared. Results: FET cycles demonstrated significantly higher rates of both chemical (29.7% vs 13.8%, Conclusions: Our findings showed that FET cycles may be associated with improved pregnancy rates in women with RIF.

Indexed as

Embryo transferimplantationpregnancy rate

Identifiers

PMID40390819
PMCPMC12087930

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.