Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391249›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Labour companionship and respectful treatment of women during childbirth: a cross-sectional study across 16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.

Soha El-Halabi, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt, Christian Agossou, Fadhlun M Alwy Al-Beity, Andrea B Pembe, Phillip Wanduru, Bianca Kandeya, Jean-Paul Dossou, Helle Molsted-Alvesson, Meghan A Bohren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Soha El-HalabiDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-9367
Kristi Sidney AnnerstedtDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian AgossouCentre de Recherche en Reproduction Humaine et en Démographie (CERRHUD), Cotonou, Benin.
Fadhlun M Alwy Al-BeityDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andrea B PembeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Phillip WanduruDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bianca KandeyaDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jean-Paul DossouCentre de Recherche en Reproduction Humaine et en Démographie (CERRHUD), Cotonou, Benin.
Helle Molsted-AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence suggests that women value and benefit from having a labour companion during childbirth. However, the applicability of the evidence to low-income and lower-middle-income countries is limited and varies. Thus, we assessed the association between the presence of labour companions and mistreatment in 16 hospitals of Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a validated questionnaire administered to women at discharge after birth between December 2021 and March 2024. The main outcomes were factor-weighted respectful treatment score and its subscores on maintained respect and dignity, privacy and maintained confidentiality and no physical and verbal abuse. The independent variable was labour companionship. We assessed the association between labour companionship and mistreatment using a linear regression model with fixed effects and cluster robust standard errors. Results: Of the 4006 included women, 39% (n=1573) had a companion during labour and/or birth. Women across the four countries and regardless of companions' presence reported high degrees of maintained privacy and confidentiality (subscores ranging between 9.5/10 in Benin to 9.9/10 in Malawi). The presence of a labour companion was significantly associated with the absence of physical and verbal abuse experiences (β=0.07; p=0.004; 95% CI: 0.02; 0.12). Conclusions: Our study adds evidence on the positive relation between labour companionship and physical and verbal abuse. The coverage of labour companionship was low across the four countries. We call for the implementation of labour companionship to allow for greater benefits of this practice.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEpidemiologyPublic Health Practice

Identifiers

PMID40391249
PMCPMC12086892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.