ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Evidence Summary of Personalized Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Volume in Adults.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Best evidence summary for platelet-rich plasma treatment of chronic wounds.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Evidence Summary of Management Strategies for Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The overload capacity poses great challenges to the management and prognosis of peritoneal dialysis patients. There have been many studies, but they are relatively fragmented and inconsistent. It is urgent to summarize high-quality evidence. The objective of this study is to thoroughly investigate, extract, assess, and synthesize the most relevant evidence about the individualized management of peritoneal volume in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. It can be utilized in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. Methods: The study used the "6S" pyramid model to identify all available evidence related to the personalized management of peritoneal volume among patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. This comprehensive search encompassed various types of evidence, including guidelines, recommended practices, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, expert consensus documents, and original research studies. These were sourced from both domestic and international guideline websites, professional association platforms, as well as relevant databases. The time limit was set from the date of database creation until April 2024, with the search commencing in December 2023. Results: The systematic search yielded 17 pieces of literature that were ultimately included in the analysis. This collection comprised seven guidelines, four best practices, two documents reflecting expert consensus, two systematic reviews, and two randomized controlled trials. The overall quality of the literature analyzed was found to be high. Through this thorough review, a total of 37 pieces of the best evidence were identified and categorized into three critical aspects: risk factors, comprehensive assessment methodologies, and various intervention strategies. Conclusion: This study serves as a consolidation of the available evidence regarding the personalized management of peritoneal volume for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. It underscores the importance of clinical staff's ability to implement tailored volume management programs that address the unique circumstances of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.