ReviewJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2025
Using the power of artificial intelligence to improve the diagnosis and management of nonmelanoma skin cancer.
Review in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, is the most prevalent type of skin cancer. While generally less aggressive than melanoma, early detection and treatment are crucial to prevent the complications. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems show promise in enhancing the accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility of NMSC diagnosis and management. These systems can facilitate early interventions, reduce unnecessary procedures, and promote collaboration among healthcare providers. Despite AI algorithms demonstrating moderate-to-high performance in diagnosing NMSC, several challenges remain. Ensuring the robustness, explainability, and generalizability of these models is vital. Collaborative efforts focusing on data diversity, image quality standards, and ethical considerations are necessary to address these issues. Building patient trust is also essential for the successful implementation of AI in the clinical settings. AI algorithms may outperform experts in controlled environments but can fall short in the real-world clinical applications, indicating a need for more prospective studies to evaluate their effectiveness in the practical scenarios. Continued research and development are essential to fully realize AI's potential in improving NMSC diagnosis and management by overcoming the existing challenges and conducting comprehensive studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.