Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392297›Full record

ReviewBioprocess and biosystems engineering2025

Genetic and bioactive functionalization of bioinks for 3D bioprinting.

Pawan Kumar, Jitender Sharma, Ravinder Kumar, Jan Najser, Jaroslav Frantik, Nagaraju Sunnam, Anil Sindhu, Seepana Praveenkumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pawan KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 136119, India. pawankamiya@yahoo.in.
Jitender SharmaDepartment of Biotechnology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 136119, India.
Ravinder KumarKarnavati University, Gandhinagar, 382422, Gujarat, India. rav.chauhan@yahoo.co.in.
Jan NajserENET Centre, VSB, Technical University of Ostrava, 70800, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav FrantikENET Centre, VSB, Technical University of Ostrava, 70800, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Nagaraju SunnamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anil SindhuDepartment of Biotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal, 131039, India.
Seepana PraveenkumarDepartment of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia Boris, 19 Mira Street, 620002, Ekaterinburg, Yeltsin, Russia.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India DBT-RA/2024/January/N/5132NCEII, Czech republic TN02000025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D bioprinting is revolutionizing tissue engineering and regenerative medicine by enabling the precise fabrication of biologically functional constructs. At its core, the success of 3D bioprinting hinges on the development of bioinks, hydrogel-based materials that support cellular viability, proliferation, and differentiation. However, conventional bioinks face limitations in mechanical strength, biological activity, and customization. Recent advancements in genetic engineering have addressed these challenges by enhancing the properties of bioinks through genetic modifications. These innovations allow the integration of stimuli-responsive elements, bioactive molecules, and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, significantly improving the mechanical integrity, biocompatibility, and functional adaptability of bioinks. This review explores the state-of-the-art genetic approaches to bioink development, emphasizing microbial engineering, genetic functionalization, and the encapsulation of growth factors. It highlights the transformative potential of genetically modified bioinks in various applications, including bone and cartilage regeneration, cardiac and liver tissue engineering, neural tissue reconstruction, and vascularization. While these advances hold promise for personalized and adaptive therapeutic solutions, challenges in scalability, reproducibility, and integration with multi-material systems persist. By bridging genetics and bioprinting, this interdisciplinary field paves the way for sophisticated constructs and innovative therapies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBioprintingInkPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansHydrogelsRegenerative MedicineTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogels3D bioprintingBioinkGelGeneticsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40392297

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.