ArticlePsychological research2025
Olfactory training and metacognitive aspects of olfaction in children aged 6-9 years: a preliminary study.
Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People differ in terms of olfactory abilities and awareness of ambient odors. Olfactory training (OT), a method primarily devoted to the rehabilitation of the sense of smell, has been found to have a positive effect on various olfactory and cognitive abilities. Here, addressing an important gap in the literature, we tested experimentally whether odor awareness and significance in young children can be enhanced through standardized OT. Additionally, we explored whether OT can improve odor identification skills and verbal fluency. A sample of 101 children (52 girls) aged between 6 and 9 years (M = 7.62 ± 0.61) took part in a 12-week OT, preceded and followed by psychophysical and questionnaire testing. Of these, 57 children were assigned to the experimental group who bi-daily smelled four odors (rose, eucalyptus, lemon and cloves), and 44 children to the placebo group who received odorless samples. Odor significance and awareness score slightly increased, and this improvement was more pronounced in the experimental group. The effect was present in the group that presented lower odor awareness at baseline, suggesting that OT may be particularly effective in children who have lesser experience with odors. OT affected neither the odor identification nor the verbal fluency. We conclude that in children, especially those who have less experience with odors, OT procedure might have certain effects on metacognitive aspects of olfaction. More studies are needed to assess the exact effects of OT on metacognitive olfactory development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.