SynthesisTranslational stroke research2025
Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Argatroban as an Adjunct to Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical efficacy between argatroban and tirofiban in patients with atherosclerotic cerebral infarction complicated by early neurological deterioration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mechanism-Oriented Treatment of Early Neurologic Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of stroke · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. While antiplatelet therapy is standard for secondary prevention, many patients still experience early neurological deterioration (END). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, can potentially limit thrombus progression and improve AIS's functional outcomes. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of argatroban in combination with single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to antiplatelets alone. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating argatroban plus antiplatelets versus antiplatelets alone in AIS patients were included. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included mRS 0-1 and mRS 3-5 at 90 days, END, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement, stroke recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. We used the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous ones at 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a P-value of 0.05. A total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 cohort studies) were included. Compared to antiplatelets alone, argatroban significantly improved functional outcomes, increasing the incidence of mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.05, 1.76, P = 0.02]) and mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.08, 2.2, P = 0.02]) while reducing END (OR = 0.42 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.85, P = 0.02]). Argatroban was also associated with greater NIHSS score improvement (MD = - 0.52 [95%CI: - 0.89, - 0.15, P = 0.005]). No significant differences were observed in mRS 3-5, stroke recurrence, ICH, sICH, or mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that argatroban combined with DAPT showed the greatest benefits. Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy improves functional recovery and reduces END without increasing bleeding risks. These findings support its use, particularly with DAPT, in mild to moderate AIS management. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to optimize dosing strategies and patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.