ArticlePloS one2025
Significance of androgen receptor and its potential for anti-androgen/androgen receptor-antagonist therapy in ovarian cancers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAndrogen promotes tumorigenesis in some cancers; however, androgen receptor (AR) is not commonly examined in ovarian cancers (OCs). In this study, we evaluated AR expression among different types of OCs and compared the results to estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER & PR). MATERIALS AND
methodsAR, ER, and PR expressions were assessed in 62 cases which were categorized into: low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSCA), high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSCA), clear cell carcinoma (CCCA), ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OECA), and granulosa cell tumor (GCT). The hormone receptors were compared and evaluated in relation to p53 and body mass index (BMI) using Fisher's Exact test.
resultsIn a majority of cases, expression of AR was concordant with ER and/or PR. Positivity for all three receptors was observed in 100% of OECAs. AR expression was seen in 92% of HGSCAs as opposed to 88% and 44% for ER and PR. LGSCAs had expressed AR and ER (100%), and PR (70%). In GCTs, positivity rates were 92%, 62%, and 92% for AR, ER, and PR. In rare cases of HGSCA and CCCA, AR was positive despite negative ER and PR.
conclusionAR is expressed in a high percentage of OCs, even more frequently than ER and PR in certain high-grade histological types. Overall, our findings are similar to the results of recent studies of AR expression in endometrial cancers. These findings support an important possible role for AR in OCs as a potential marker to serve as a therapeutic target in these malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.