ArticleScientific reports2025
Balancing accuracy and cost in machine learning models for detecting medial vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease: a pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced early chronic kidney disease prediction using hybrid waterwheel plant algorithm for deep neural network optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms that integrate multiple biomarkers are increasingly used in disease detection, yet economic considerations are often overlooked. Medial vascular calcification (mVC), a pathology associated with elevated cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD), requires cost-effective diagnostic approaches. This pilot study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of machine learning models for mVC detection using traditional risk markers and circulating biomarkers in 152 CKD patients undergoing living donor kidney transplantation. Patients were classified as having no/minimal (n = 93) or moderate/extensive (n = 59) mVC. Five classification frameworks with automatic variable selection identified predictors of mVC. Age and copeptin were selected by all algorithms, while diabetes, male sex, choline, and osteoprotegerin were chosen by four methods. The number of features selected ranged from 5 to 21. Although accuracy differences among classifiers were limited to 3%, models using more features nearly tripled the procedure's cost. By incorporating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the study highlighted significant disparities in performance versus cost among classifiers. The present findings suggest that machine learning has the potential to complement imaging techniques for mVC detection and uncover novel biomarkers. However, modest performance improvements may not justify higher costs, underscoring the importance of considering cost-effectiveness when selecting classification models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.