ArticleScientific reports2025
The relationship between vertical malocclusions and ossification changes in the cranial base and upper cervical spine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vertebral Cervical Fusion in Individuals with and without Open Bite: A Comparative Matched Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growth and development of the maxillofacial complex share a common embryological origin with the cranial base and upper cervical spine; therefore, anomalies in these regions may be linked to variations in the skeletal pattern. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between the morphological features of the sella turcica bridging, ponticulus posticus, posterior arch deficiency of the first cervical vertebra, known as the atlas, and the cervical vertebral maturation stages and vertical malocclusions. Randomly selected 300 pre-orthodontic treatment patients (aged 7 to 40 years) were divided into groups according to cervical stage (CS1-CS6) and type of vertical malocclusion. According to the study protocol, cephalometric analysis and evaluation of the sella turcica and atlas were performed twice by two researchers under the supervision of a radiologist. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 29.0. Sella turcica bridging was significantly more common in postpubertal patients (58.2%; p < 0.05). Ponticulus posticus and sella turcica bridging occurred more frequently in patients with low mandibular plane angle (43.3% and 51.1%, respectively), whereas atlas posterior arch deficiency occurred more frequently in patients with high mandibular plane angle (24.2%). However, only atlas posterior arch deficiency showed significant difference (p < 0.05). According to logistic regression, patients in the CS6 stage were less likely to have type 1 ponticulus posticus and more likely to have type 2 sella turcica bridging (p < 0.05). Patients with low angle were less likely to have atlas posterior arch deficiency (p < 0.05). Sella turcica bridging and atlas posterior arch deficiency are associated with the skeletal pattern and cervical stage. Sella turcica bridging was more prevalent during the postpubertal period, whereas atlas posterior arch deficiency was more prevalent in those with a high mandibular plane angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.