Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394264›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2025

Alcohol wipes are the most justifiably sustainable disinfection method for Goldmann tonometry.

James W Corbett, Sukhpal S Sandhu, Jesse Gale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James W CorbettWellington Regional Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-0741
Sukhpal S SandhuThe Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jesse GaleWellington Regional Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. jesse.gale@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-445X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The essential technique of Goldmann tonometry is thought to have a risk of nosocomial infection, and thus there has been pressure to use single-use tonometer tips or slower and more-costly methods of disinfection for reusable tips. Here we review the evidence of infection from tonometry and the evidence behind different disinfection methods. The only infection reported to be transmitted by tonometry is adenoviral epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, which is also transmitted without tonometry and is a relatively low-morbidity infection. More serious eye infections or systemic infections have never been reported to be attributed to tonometry or eye examination. The most popular, affordable, quick and sustainable method of disinfection, using alcohol swabs to wipe the tip, is the only economically justifiable method.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionDisinfectionEquipment ContaminationEthanolTonometry, OcularHumansEthanol

Identifiers

PMID40394264
PMCPMC12209457

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.