ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating Vitamin D Deficiency and Toxicity in Indian Children: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamin D is essential for bone health, immune function, and overall growth in children. Its deficiency or excess can lead to significant health issues. Despite its importance, there is little systematic data on vitamin D levels in healthy children in Eastern India, with disparities observed across age, gender, and geographical factors. This study investigates the trends in serum vitamin D levels among Indian children, with a specific focus on age- and gender-related variations, and evaluates the implications of current supplementation practices.
objectiveTo evaluate vitamin D levels in Eastern Indian children (one month to 18 years) and assess the impact of age, gender, and healthcare settings on vitamin D status.
methodsA retrospective hospital-based study analyzed vitamin D levels in pediatric patients across different age groups, genders, and healthcare settings (outpatient department (OPD), inpatient department (IPD), and intensive care unit (ICU)). We reviewed data on supplementation practices, clinical manifestations, and underlying conditions, but the retrospective nature of the study limited detailed histories. Data were represented as mean, SD, median, and IQR. An appropriate nonparametric test was applied to find the statistical difference in the data.
resultsOf the total of 1,384 children, the mean age was 11.2 ± 4.9 years. A statistically significant age-related decline was seen (p<0.001) in vitamin D levels. Males had higher vitamin D compared to females (25.75 ± 3.09 vs. 22.85 ± 18.84 ng/ml). Hypovitaminosis D was significantly more prevalent in adolescents aged 11-18 years, with 693 (80.6%) having levels <30 ng/ml (p<0.001). In contrast, hypervitaminosis D (>100 ng/ml) was more common in infants under one year, affecting four (6.5%) (p=0.012). Healthcare settings like OPD, IPD, and ICU did not affect the vitamin D levels significantly.
conclusionVitamin D supplementation in neonates has effectively maintained optimal levels, but careful monitoring is essential to prevent hypervitaminosis. Targeted interventions, especially for adolescents and females, are critical to addressing hypovitaminosis and improving overall vitamin D status in children. A well-defined supplementation protocol, combined with regular screening, can ensure balanced levels in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.