Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395282›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Incorporating gene expression and environment for genomic prediction in wheat.

Jia Liu, Andrew Gock, Kerrie Ramm, Sandra Stops, Tanya Phongkham, Adam Norman, Russell Eastwood, Eric Stone, Shannon Dillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jia LiuAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Andrew GockEnvironment, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Kerrie RammAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Sandra StopsAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Tanya PhongkhamAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Adam NormanAustralian Grain Technologies, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
Russell EastwoodAustralian Grain Technologies, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
Eric StoneBiology Data Science Institute (BDSI), College of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Shannon DillonAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The adoption of novel molecular strategies such as genomic selection (GS) in crop breeding have been key to maintaining rates of genetic gain through increased efficiency and shortening the cycle of evaluation relative to conventional selection. In the search for improved methodologies that incorporate novel sources of variation for the assessment of genetic merit, GS remains a focus of crop breeding research globally. Here we explored the role transcriptome data could play in enhancing GS in wheat. Methods: Across 286 wheat lines, we integrated phenotype and multi-omic data from controlled environment and field experiments including ca. 40K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), abundance data for ca. 50K transcripts as well as meta-data (e.g. categorical environments) to predict individual genetic merit for two agronomic traits, flowering time and height. We evaluated the performance of different model scenarios based on linear (GBLUP) and Gaussian/nonlinear (RKHS) regression in the Bayesian analytical framework. These models explored the relative contributions of different combinations of additive genomic (G), transcriptomic (T) and environment (E), with and without considering non-additive epistasis, dominance and genotype by environment ( Results: In controlled environments, where traits were measured under contrasting daylength regimes (long and short days), transcriptome abundance outperformed other random effects when considered independently, while the model combining SNP, environment and Discussion: Our results show there is a predictive advantage to direct inclusion of the transcriptome for genomic evaluation in wheat breeding for traits where

Indexed as

Bayesian analysisenvironmental factorgenomic predictionomics transcriptomewheat

Identifiers

PMID40395282
PMCPMC12090535

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.