ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
Machine Learning Classification Based on Individual Whole-Brain Functional Connectivity in Male OSA Patients.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Previous studies have shown altered paired brain functional connectivity (FC) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, linked to cognitive impairment. This study utilized individual FC analysis to investigate the distinctive FC characteristics in OSA and evaluate their classification efficiency. Methods: We included 82 moderate to severe OSA patients [41 OSA with normal cognition (OSA-NC), 41 OSA with mild cognitive impairments (OSA-MCI)] and 84 healthy control (HC). Resting-state fMRI data and clinical scale data were collected. Individual FC was derived using multi-task learning-based sparse convex alternating structure optimization, with feature selection via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Support vector machine classifiers were used for OSA vs HC and OSA-NC vs OSA-MCI classification. The top 10 FC features contributing to classification were analyzed for group differences. A significance level of Results: The study results showed that individual FC achieved higher classification accuracy than traditional Pearson-based FC (OSA vs HC: 91.8% vs 79.5%; OSA-NC vs OSA-MCI: 81.3% vs 63.8%). The top 10 individual-specific FC networks contributing to classification were mainly located in the default mode network, attention network, showing significant inter-group differences in connectivity strength between the two groups. Conclusion: This study identified static individualized FC characteristics in OSA patients with varying cognitive impairments. Based on individual FC, the classification accuracy of OSA-NC and OSA-MCI was significantly improved, the individual FC may serve as a potential neuroimaging marker for predicting OSA-MCI, providing an individual clinical diagnosis and treatment evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.