Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395855›Full record

ReviewMechanobiology in medicine2024

Force-dependent rapid immunoassay of high specificity and sensitivity.

Xiaodan Zhao, Yanqige Jiang, Yu Zhou, Jie Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mechanobiology in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaodan ZhaoDepartment of Physics, National University of Singapore, 117542, Singapore.
Yanqige JiangMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
Yu ZhouMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
Jie YanDepartment of Physics, National University of Singapore, 117542, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of early detection and isolation of infected individuals, along with the quantitative assessment of antibodies against the virus, has gained widespread recognition during the ongoing covid-19 pandemic. This necessitates the development of cost-effective, user-friendly, decentralized testing methods characterized by both high sensitivity and specificity. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of an innovative, low-cost rapid decentralized immunoassay technology, applicable across various diagnostic and quantitative testing scenarios. Distinguishing itself from conventional immunoassay technologies, this method is featured with mechanically enhanced specificity without compromising sensitivity. We delve into the basic principle of the technology and a comparative analysis of this technology in relation to other immunodiagnostic methods, highlighting its potential applications in a wide spectrum of diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

Antibody quantificationCOVID-19Finger-prick whole bloodImmunodiagnosticsPoint-of-care (POC)

Identifiers

PMID40395855
PMCPMC12082306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.