ArticleMethodsX2025
Parkinson's disease detection using inceptionV3: A Deep learning approach.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cutting-edge transformer-based deep learning for Parkinson's disease diagnosing using multimodal hand-drawing and handwriting analysis.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Article
- Integrated deep learning for cardiovascular risk assessment and diagnosis: An evolutionary mating algorithm-enhanced CNN-LSTM.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Bio-inspired elephant herd optimization based method for building adaptive ensemble of transfer learning based classifiers.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition that progressively affects motor function and causes tremors, rigidity, and bradykinesia. Detection of PD at an early stage is important to ensure timely intervention and better patient outcomes. This study uses deep learning algorithms to classify spiral images traced by patients as an inexpensive diagnostic technique for the detection of PD. A database consists of spiral images drawn manually by PD patients and normal individuals, divided into training and testing sets. To discriminate between spiral drawings of Parkinsonian and healthy cases four Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture like DenseNet121, InceptionV3, VGG16, and LeNet are used. Followed by transfer learning which is employed to improve model performance by extracting fine motor impairment patterns in the spirals. DenseNet121 and InceptionV3 achieve competitive performance with 98.44 % accuracy, whereas VGG16 demonstrates excellent feature extraction performance. The study emphasizes the relevance of deep learning in non-invasive PD diagnosis, as a consistent, efficient, and automated method of early detection. The future can be directed towards the combination of spiral images with other biomarkers or a broader data set with other motor measures in a wider disease assessment.•The study focuses on enhancing features extraction by leveraging hybrid deep learning models, improving classification performance.•Implementation of features scaling leads to better model performance, with improved accuracy.•The comparative analysis of CNN architecture provides valuable insights into balancing computational efficiency and classification performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.